From a theoretical perspective ‘good’ writing is not a standard but socio-culturally determined and is not uniform around the world.
Professor of Education, University of Exeter
There is a certain level of nuance needed to answer this. ‘Good academic writing’ is contentious. Academic writing differs across geographical regions; what is accepted as ‘good’ in Bangladesh, Malaysia or Pakistan might not apply to the UK, Australia or Canada. Differences exist, for example in terms of how “direct” or “indirect” the writing is; the latter countries tend to adopt a more critical approach. By critical here, I imply the willingness to question an author. Even if you have not had experience of writing in other countries, you could have learnt certain “standards”, whether from school or otherwise, that might not quite fit the expectations at university.
There are some things: sentence structure; coherence; clarity; structure which are likely to be characteristics of ‘good’ writing in any writing, not just academic genres.
Professor of Education, University of Exeter
Reflection
Think about what makes ‘good’ writing in your field. Describe your writing context.
Tip: Find out what is the “accepted” norm in your discipline. This may require research and effort but it will be time spent well. Try to access your departmental PGR (postgraduate researcher) Handbook.
It is the ‘expectations’ and ‘norms’ that go into the mix of explaining genre. The next section is closely related to this one, so read on.